www.gflames.fora.pl

nukk41df

's gift. Thus, young children become a defendant. Common property of all to have a son,[url=http://www.redir.fr/gbivb]hollister paris[/url], Ling had a happy family. His parents were in the early 1990s,[url=http://www.portsunlightorchestra.org.uk/Assets/mu.php]mulberry outlet[/url], got married 7 years gave birth to him. In early 2009, small Ling 11 years old,[url=http://www.geol.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~environ/cgi-bin/lightlight.cgi?res=25023]http://www.geol.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~environ/cgi-bin/lightlight.cgi?res=25023[/url],[url=http://www.redir.fr/gbivb]hollister france[/url], their parents because of emotional discord and divorce agreement. "Considering the wanderers later in life, in order to ensure the healthy growth of him,[url=http://www.tridentsportscars.com/crm/include/class.php?p=42]moncler outlet[/url], and we agreed to give his son the common property of husband and wife." Small Ling's mother said that these provisions clearly written on the divorce agreement. After her parents divorced, his mother is a small Ling guardian. Parents divorced three years, small Ling has been living together with his mother. Small Ling's parents divorced when in the end it gave him something: Jiangbei District,[url=http://www.luutii.ma-pe.net/wp-content/footer.php]peuterey outlet[/url],[url=http://cgi.www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~m_s/yybbs/yybbs.cgi]http://cgi.www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~m_s/yybbs/yybbs.cgi[/url], Yubei District,[url=http://www.yaokan360.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=9459&fromuid=1774]http://www.yaokan360.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=9459&fromuid=1774[/url], northern New, large and small, a total of six all or part of the property in the listing. One of which is located in northern New house with over 220 square meters, to buy time to put 99% of the property is registered in the name of a small Ling. After her parents divorced, and the mother of small Ling 110 million price to sell this house. After his father go back, apply to the court house for another five sets of values were assessed. After evaluation of professional bodies, which total value of more than 220 real estate five sets yuan. In so doing, still reading the small Ling tantamount to a holding millions of millionaires. But in fact, three years ago, the property has not transfer to his name,[url=http://www43.tok2.com/home/chiba/town/script/board.cgi]http://www43.tok2.com/home/chiba/town/script/board.cgi[/url], is mother to help him take care of. After her parents divorced, his mother and grandmother with small Ling lived in a 100-square-meter house in northern New Dragon Lake Road. Small Ling's aunt lived a house. Small Ling's grandmother lived a house. Another facade and a house are rented out. Father called for the repeal of property donated Unexpectedly, three years after the divorce, the father regret. "After my divorce, little property are gone, now penniless, life is very difficult and I want to withdraw my son's gift." This is the reason for the small Ling's father sued. My father said, he did not go through after the divorce had to transfer the property to his son formalities,[url=http://www.redir.fr/gaivb]louboutin pas cher[/url], "donated property prior to delivery, can be revoked." When the court hearing, small Ling did not appear in court but by an agent, and his mother with legal representatives and the identity of the third person case, sitting on the court with her ex-husband to court. This couple had a very decent dressed, walked into the courtroom when both are calm, do not say hello to each other. Small Ling's father stated in court litigation request,[url=http://www.eprefix.co.uk/wp-includes/customize.php?p=27]hollister outlet[/url],[url=http://www.unityfullgospelchurch.org/#comment-39777]http://www.unityfullgospelchurch.org/#comment-39777[/url], small Ling's agent immediately to refute: the plaintiff (ie, small Ling father) and a third person (ie,[url=http://ia26.ac-grenoble.fr/dden/hco.php]hollister[/url], small Ling mother) application for divorce agreement, is both true meaning said plaintiff unilaterally divorce settlement agreement called for the repeal of the distribution of property, no legal basis and should be dismissed. Small Ling Buddist mother: "When we divorced,[url=http://www.jamboleefamily.com/cgi-bin/bbs/light.cgi?res=520]http://www.jamboleefamily.com/cgi-bin/bbs/light.cgi?res=520[/url],[url=http://ia26.ac-grenoble.fr/dden/hco.php]hollister france[/url], said good kids had to put all property is because of this,[url=http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=350296583336&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=350296583336&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT[/url], I agree this is a child of divorce financial compensation and raising fees and he now, no.. gave the child any costs I am willing to put the property donated to children who unilaterally revoke the agreement, and against the interests of my child. "" Initially,[url=http://www.balh.co.uk/project-files/barbour.php]barbour outlet[/url], it was willing to gift, but now I sought to withdraw! "court investigation, the atmosphere was somewhat tension, small Ling's father insisted that before the real estate transfer yet, he is entitled to revoke the gift. Jiangbei District Court dismissed the lawsuit after the court hearing the case yesterday, the first instance verdict. The court found that the agreement on the division of property in a divorce agreement or the terms of the divorce because the parties agreed on the division of property, for both men and women are legally binding. When divorce, the couple's joint property agreement grants small Ling all, is a kind of relationship for the purpose of lifting the identity of both parties, to abandon the common property of the donor behavior segmentation rights. The divorce agreement is the true meaning of the expression of the parties and found no fraud, coercion and other circumstances at the time of the signing of the agreement, and the content does not violate the law. The court held that, in the case of parties to a marriage relationship in fact be lifted because the divorce agreement, the purpose of the donated property has been achieved. Whether the relevant property register the change does not affect the validity and effectiveness of the gift agreement. In addition,[url=http://210.150.243.147/cgi-bin/askaj/aska.cgi?session=mrvxx&amp]http://210.150.243.147/cgi-bin/askaj/aska.cgi?session=mrvxx&amp[/url],[url=http://www.restturas.lt/includes/cl.php]louboutin[/url], small Ling asked his father is no longer any property, seriously affect the life of the reasons for lack of factual basis,[url=http://www.lessingers-berlin.de/heartchor/system.php]parajumpers online shop[/url], the court did not admissible. The court ultimately dismissed the claims of small Ling father.